Environmental and economical, just the combo we need right now! Just like Obama’s economical stimulus plan of going green and saving our bank account – except this plan gets you a super cute bag along the way =) I actually bought Matt & Nat bags for my vegetarian sister in-law and I was expecting to get a plastic-y and sticky faux-leather looking thing but these bags look really good. The design also helps, they are actually stylish instead of some bohemian, crochet, home-made pouch with yarn string straps. Seriously though, these are good enough regardless of your dietary choices – the Frugal Snob price tag and environmental conscious materials are icing on the cake. I like the metallic, it adds to the distraction of it being non-leather and the texture makes the silver look more expensive, for silver that is. Of course the black is always the safe choice to hide any limitations of synthetic and is obviously more practical. The asymmetrical zippers and tab details are super chic and the hobo shape is back (although it didn’t leave for very long). At Neiman Marcus for $240.
and boy these are ugly … not even black color can hide this
there are many gorgeous bags not made out of leather, unfortunately these are not among them. so sorry 🙁
Sorry, can’t side with you on these. They look really juvenile and cheap.
I’m actually a fan of Matt & Nat — they’re very creative in terms of the materials they use. What are these made of? They look a bit like the Japanese rice paper bags they released for Fall/Winter…
My sister-in-law has one of their bags. The bags are well made and are very stylish. I believe that they are rice paper bags. At least they are not as expensive as Stella McCartney bags are!!
FWIW, ‘pleather’ and other fake leather are petroleum-based products. Not ‘green’ as leather-wearers are lectured about.
I guess the only justification for using these materials is you don’t wear animals, not that you want to go eco-friendly, IMO.
The bags are OK, certainly not worth 240.00. I find as cute or more at Target for two-digit prices.
Actually, the process of using real leather causes more environmental damage. Due to the the raising of the animal(land and food), the transporation, the way they deal with the skin.
http://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-clothing/leather-environmental-hazards.aspx
I usually love shiny things, but these aren’t really doing it for me. I agree with LP, not worth $240. I’ll def. check out the designer though, maybe they have other bags I’d like more.
They do look like they’re made from japanese rice papers. But such material is durable enough to make the bag last long. I find those really adorable 🙂
“FWIW, ‘pleather’ and other fake leather are petroleum-based products. Not ‘green’ as leather-wearers are lectured about.”
LP’s comment is absolutely TRUE – many of the “vegan” materials are indeed worse than leather, which at least is natural. Much of the time it is a marketing ruse.
Pleather (aka: PLASTIC) is the gift that keeps on giving: hot in the summer, cold in the winter, and DOES NOT DISINTEGRATE when discarded in landfills.
bh
I like these, and the fact that they are “green” is a bonus. Very stylish.
Correction for Carni-Commentors: This bag is NOT made of pleather. Made and Nat do not use PVC in their Japanese Paper designs.
The bags are definitely not worth whatever they are charging; they are made in China and should be priced accordingly. And although these ugly bags may not be made out of PVC, most Matt & Nat products are, which is a good reason to avoid supporting their phoney “eco-friendly” mantra.
The bags are definitely not worth whatever they are charging; they are made in China and should be priced accordingly. And although these ugly bags may not be made out of PVC, most Matt & Nat products are, which is a good reason to avoid supporting their phoney “eco-friendly” mantra.
The bags are definitely not worth whatever they are charging; they are made in China and should be priced accordingly. And although these ugly bags may not be made out of PVC, most Matt & Nat products are, which is a good reason to avoid supporting their phoney “eco-friendly” mantra.
I was so surprised to look at the tag of a Matt & Nat Samsara wallet and find that it was made of 100% PVC!!! This is NOT a enviro-friendly option at all! After all the hype about eco-friendly bags I am really disappointed and won’t be buying that wallet (no matter how super-cute it was). What a bummer.
I purchased a man’s bag 8 months ago. It retails for around $250 on their website.
After using it for 8 months for light to moderate business use, the shoulder strap snapped off while I was at the airport. Not only embarrassing, but annoying, too. A shoulder bag without a shoulder strap is pretty useless.
I have tried to get in touch with their customer services a few times. No response to email, no returned phone calls.
I’d think that when spending $250 on a bag it should a) last more than 8 months, and b) the people who sell me the bag should care enough to keep me happy.
My Matt and Nat bag is beautiful, but I am disappointed with the quality, and the customer service.
Would not recommend anybody spend their money here.
Almost everything made today has a negative effect on the environment, but not every process leaves way for cruelty to animals and the killing of innocent things. So yes, maybe people are a bit more concerned about the animals than the environment, because animals can feel pain. Have a lovely day!